翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Buchanan Passage ・ Buchanan Point ・ Buchanan Rides Alone ・ Buchanan River ・ Buchanan School ・ Buchanan Sharp ・ Buchanan Smithy ・ Buchanan State Forest ・ Buchanan Street ・ Buchanan Street railway station ・ Buchanan Street station ・ Buchanan Street subway station ・ Buchanan Township ・ Buchanan Township, Atchison County, Missouri ・ Buchanan Township, Michigan ・ Buchanan v. Warley ・ Buchanan Valley ・ Buchanan Valley Township, Emmons County, North Dakota ・ Buchanan's ・ Buchanan's Birthplace State Park ・ Buchanan's Hotel ・ Buchanan, California ・ Buchanan, Georgia ・ Buchanan, Indiana ・ Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney ・ Buchanan, Iowa ・ Buchanan, Liberia ・ Buchanan, Madera County, California ・ Buchanan, Michigan ・ Buchanan, Missouri Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Buchanan v. Warley ： ウィキペディア英語版 Buchanan v. Warley ''Buchanan v. Warley'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court addressed civil government instituted racial segregation in residential areas. The Court held that a Louisville, Kentucky, city ordinance prohibiting the sale of real property to blacks violated the Fourteenth Amendment, which protected freedom of contract, reversing the ruling of the Kentucky Court of Appeals. Unlike prior state court rulings that had overturned racial zoning ordinances on takings clause grounds due to those ordinances' failures to grandfather land owned prior to enactment, the Court in ''Buchanan'' ruled that the motive for the Louisville ordinance, race, was an insufficient purpose to make the prohibition constitutional. ==Background== In the state of Kentucky, there was a city ordinance that forbade any black individuals to own or occupy any buildings where therewas a greater number of white individuals resided. In 1915, a man named Charles H. Buchanan, a white man who was seeling his property, brought a lawsuit against William Warley, who was an African-American buyer, to convince Warley that he should complete the purchase of Buchanan's property. Warley argued that Louisville enacted an ordinance that disallowed African Americans from purchasing property in a mostly white neighborhood. In cases where the situation was reversed, white individuals would not be allowed to reside in neighborhoods where there was a black majority. Warley agreed to purchase the property but refused to pay the full price, arguing because he was not allowed to live in the property that he purchased. Buchanan sued Warley and his suit eventually reached the Supreme Court. Warley ultimately paid Buchanan the full price of his property, recognizing "It is understood that I am purchasing the above property for the purpose of having erected thereon a house which I propose to make my residence, and it is a distinct part of this agreement that I shall not be required to accept a deed to the above property or to pay for said property unless I have the right under the laws of the State of Kentucky and the City of Louisville to occupy said property as a residence." 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Buchanan v. Warley」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.